Frequently Asked Questions
|
What is it? |
The Mediator Directory is a sister publication of The Mediator
Magazine,a monthly trade publication launched in 2007.
The Directory's ultimate aim is to offer the market a
comprehensive profile of every UK mediator, whether professional
or part time. Published online, the website is also designed to serve
as a feedback repository for parties and advisers to leave such
comments as they believe may be useful to other parties seeking to
use the same mediator.
We believe that publishing feedback, given 'on the record' by
named individuals, will add to users' confidence in the process,
while clarifying the market's preferences and requirements.
Our concern is to present the highest possible standard of
intelligence about the mediator marketplace, and none of our
income is derived from the mediation process.
While we believe that the concept of the directory represents
a step change in the marketplace, service providers we have
consulted (including the ADR Group) welcome the idea as a positive
development, and not a challenge to their businesses.
The site will also solicit feedback on the performance of service
providers.
|
Who will view the site?
|
As the principal buyers of mediation services,the site has been designed with law firms in mind. At the same time as soliciting profile details from mediators, we are signing up law firms to
incorporate use of the site (non-exclusively) into their mediator
selection process. Lawyers, as well as parties, will also be encouraged
to leave feedback post-mediation.
|
Why we have done it
|
We have two principal reasons for publishing the site: first, solicitors
are demanding a single reference point as the market continues
to fragment. Secondly, it is evident that the market is rife with
misleading and potentially harmful rumours about mediators' skills,
aptitudes and attributes. Confidentiality allows such rumours to
go unchallenged. Our hope is that the site will encourage greater
transparency in the profession with all its attendant benefits. |
Who we are
|
Matthew Rushton is the founder and publisher of bothThe
Mediator Magazine and The Mediator Directory. He has been a
legal correspondent on various titles over the last decade. In recent
years he has written a biography of mediator David I Shapiro, and is
one of a number of co-authors of a journalism text book (published
New York, 2006) on writing for business publications.
|
What are the benefits?
|
As feedback accumulates, mediators will be able to point clients
towards appointment-critical data which are:
- independently solicited
- independently verified
- 'on the record', and therefore traceable
Early indications are that law firms are keen to graft use of the
site into their dispute handling processes on a non-exclusive basis. | |
The site will therefore offer:
- a chance to beauty parade on a significant number of
disputes
- a presence among the entire market; not just a panel
- the chance to let your reputation speak for itself
- the equivalent to a word-of-mouth recommendation of your
expertise
|
| For Clients |
The site offers professionals a unique and valuable forum to
exchange word-of-mouth recommendations on mediators. Clients
(on the basis of service provider feedback) will be able to choose
whether to appoint direct, or where a choice exists, through any of
the service providers or panels of which mediators are a member. |
| For the wider market |
At present no relationship exists between mediators' fees and the
value they bring. The position is perpetuated by colossal oversupply
of mediators. Until the market has sufficient information to be able
to discriminate on quality rather than price, downward pressure on
fees is inevitable. Putting information of the type collected by The
Mediator Directory in the public domain will speed up the maturing
of the market and bring forward the point in time when mediators'
value is reflected in the fees they command.
Though unintended, the site also has potential to act as an
informal, de facto regulator of the market. Some mediators find
distant scrutiny of the type the site offers preferable to a more
formal and intrusive system of regulation. Transparency and scrutiny
will, we believe, significantly enhance confidence in mediators and
in the process itself. Such confidence, we hope, will fuel mediation's
wider use and society will reap the benefits with which all mediators
are familiar. |
| What are the risks? |
There are numerous safeguards against factually inaccurate or unjustifiable feedback being left about you. First, in order to leave
feedback users must register, which involves an email verification
process. This means a) we know who they are and b) we can contact them. Secondly, feedback has to relate to a mediation on a
specified date (the user's attendance can, if necessary, be verified
with the mediator) and thirdly, all feedback is quarantined for a
period of seven days until we, as publishers, have 'okayed' it for
publication. Finally, the site is set up to email registered mediators
every time feedback is left, so the mediator has seven days to make
representations to the publishers if it appears factually inaccurate
or unjustifiable.
We wish to emphasise that the purpose of the site is to publicise
the particular skills, aptitudes and attributes of mediators. Accordingly, in order to leave negative feedback users will be required to
confirm that criticisms have first been discussed with the mediator.
|
| What does it cost? |
The names of all mediators are listed free of charge automatically,
and feedback can be left about them whether they pay to embellish
their profile or not. To add a photograph, contact details, a full CV,
plus any articles which might assist in promoting your practice, the
cost is £120 per annum. |
| What next? |
Should you have any further queries, please contact Matthew
Rushton on 08444 871 172. We hope you find the above convincing
and warmly encourage you to visit the site and begin uploading
publicity material.
|
|